P5282Comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance ejection fraction and left ventricular volumes by long axis feature tracking strain analysis versus standard short axis stack contour tracing

Abstract Introduction Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) feature tracking (FT) is based on the recognition of endocardial features obtained during standard CMR cine imaging to be tracked and followed throughout the cardiac cycle. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been proposed as a superior measure for diagnosis and prognosis than ejection fraction (EF). However, EF remains an important primary parameter to describe cardiac function. A rapid determination of GLS based on three long axis views (LAX) allows for a simultaneous calculation of EF without additional imaging or post-processing promising a significant reduction of scan and post-processing time. Purpose The purpose of this work is to compare the LV volumes and EF obtained during assessment of GLS based on CMR feature tracking with standard analysis of a short axis (SAX) stack used as the reference standard. Methods 75 consecutive patients underwent a routine clinical scan obtaining a full SAX stack as well as 3 standard LAX views using either 3-Tesla or 1,5-Tesla clinical scanners. We determined LV volumes and EF based on the reference standard as well as feature tracking analysis with additional GLS. A p value