P3558Cardiac magnetic resonance characteristics of the transplanted heart: first results of the prospective Heart-TIming CMR substudy

Abstract Background In case of heart transplantation (HTX) the heart is affected by several factors e.g. ischaemia/reperfusion, denervation, immunosuppression. During the adaptation, the heart may show marked temporal changes in terms of myocardial mechanics, function and tissue characteristics. To better understand temporal characteristics after orthotopic bicaval HTX we started the prospective Heart-TIming (Transplantation Imaging) trial in January 2018 including standard 12-lead ECG, 24-hour Holter monitor, endomyocardial biopsy, transthoracic echocardiography, invasive coronary angiography with intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). Aim In our CMR substudy we aimed to evaluate the physiological structural and functional left and right ventricular characteristics and their temporal changes after HTX using CMR. Methods As part of the study HTX patients underwent CMR at 1, 3 and 6 months after HTX (n=31; 52±10.5y, 25 male). Cine images, T2-weighted, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and adenosine stress perfusion (at 1 month) images were acquired. In order to describe physiological characteristics of the transplanted heart we excluded pts with significant coronary artery disease, ischaemic scar, ≥Grade II allograft rejection from this present study (n=6). We assessed the left (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fractions, volumes, masses (M) and LV strain. We assessed the global strain values: longitudinal, circumferential (GCS) strain and the standard deviation (SD) of the peak longitudinal strain (LS) and the left ventricular mechanical dispersion. We compared baseline volumetric and strain parameters to age matched healthy controls (n=20; 47±11.4y, 15 male), and the temporal changes between one, three and 6 months. Results Comparing the HTX patients' CMR parameters at one month with normal controls, HTX patients had lower LV and RV end-diastolic volumes (LVEDVi: 76.6±15.9 vs 90.6±11.6ml/m2; RVEDVi 74.5±17.5 vs 90.3±12.1ml/m2, p