P3369Impact of global left ventricular afterload, aortic stenosis severity and left ventricular hypertrophy on global myocardial work

Abstract Background Myocardial work (MW) is an innovative tool, that derives from myocardial strain with the advantage to incorporate measurement of deformation and load. Therefore, it could be useful in conditions of increased afterload, such as aortic stenosis (AS). To date, little is known about...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Ilardi, F, Marchetta, S, Dulgheru, R E, Cimino, S, D'Amico, G, Cicenia, M, Lancellotti, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Myocardial work (MW) is an innovative tool, that derives from myocardial strain with the advantage to incorporate measurement of deformation and load. Therefore, it could be useful in conditions of increased afterload, such as aortic stenosis (AS). To date, little is known about the changes in MW related to AS severity, left ventricle (LV) geometry and arterial compliance. Purpose We investigated the effect of valvulo-arterial impedance (Zva), stroke volume and LV hypertrophy in patients with AS and preserved LV ejection fraction (EF). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 283 patients (60% males, mean age 71±12 years old) with AS (aortic valve area ≤1.5 cm2) and LVEF≥50%. Exclusion criteria were more than mild associated cardiac valve lesion, left bundle branch block, and suboptimal quality of speckle-tracking image analysis. The control group included 50 patients matched for age and sex. Clinical, demographic and resting echocardiographic data were recorded, including quantification of 2D global longitudinal strain (GLS), global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work (GWW) and global work efficiency (GWE). Results Patients with AS had higher systolic (p=0.017) and diastolic arterial pressure (p=0.007), increased LV wall thickness, mass index (p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz745.0245