Electrocardiographic markers of depolarization and repolarization in lead V1 predict right ventricular dysfunction in patients with heart failure

Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is an important predictor of survival in patients with heart failure (HF) with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). To date there is limited data on the value of the electrocardiogram in predicting RV function. Purpose G...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Moldovan, M P, Eotvos, E A, Coseriu, G, Burde, A, Avram, T, Lazar, R D, Zehan, I, Sarb, A, Mocan, L, Blendea, E D, Tentea, P, Gusetu, G, Pop, S, Blendea, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is an important predictor of survival in patients with heart failure (HF) with both preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). To date there is limited data on the value of the electrocardiogram in predicting RV function. Purpose Given these considerations the aim of our study was to assess the possible relationship between several electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters and right ventricular function evaluated by echocardiography. Methods We included 109 patients (age 61±14 years, 68men) of whom 89 had HF (HFpEF N=62 and HFrEF N=27) and 20 patients without HF. Twelve-lead ECG and echocardiograms were performed in all patients. We assessed echocardiographic parameters of global and regional RV function. Results Time to Intrinsicoid deflection in lead V1 (TID-V1) and the QTc interval measured in lead V1 (QTc-V1) were significantly more prolonged in patients with HF vs. patients with no HF (36±24ms vs. 23±15ms; p=0.03, and 450±40ms vs. 427±20ms; p=0.047 respectively). TID-V1 correlated significantly with the tricuspid annulus systolic excursion (TAPSE) and RV fractional area change (FAC; r=-0.31; p=0.02, and r=-0.35; p=0.029 respectively). QTc-V1 correlated with parameters of global and regional RV function including FAC, RV apex longitudinal strain, RV free wall strain, and global RV strain (r=-0.42; p=0.0004, r=0.35; p=0.0032, r=0.21; p=0.045, and r=0.41; p=0.0005). RV dysfunction as defined by RV-FAC 30ms with a sensitivity of 61% and specificity of 75%; AUC=0.752 and by QTc-V1>440ms with a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 57%; AUC=0.888, and by a multivariate logistic regression model that also included TID-V1 and QTcV1, age, TAPSE, and LV ejection fraction with an AUC=0.967 (Figure). Conclusions Lead V1 time to intrinsic deflection and QTc-V1 predict RV dysfunction independent of echocardiographic parameters of ventricular function in patients with HF.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.998