Impact of chronic kidney disease on patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non Obstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA)

Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with more advanced disease, a higher risk of complications and poorer prognosis, as well as increased mortality. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of CKD in patients with myocardial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Gil Mancebo, N, Mata Caballero, R, Fraile Sanz, A, Izquierdo Coronel, B, Rodriguez Montes, P, Martin Munoz, M, Alvarez Bello, M, Perela Alvarez, C, Nieto Ibanez, D, De La Serna Real De Asua, M, Humanes Ybanez, S, Olsen Rodriguez, R, Espinosa Pascual, M, Awamleh Garcia, P, Alonso Martin, J J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with more advanced disease, a higher risk of complications and poorer prognosis, as well as increased mortality. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of CKD in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) and its influence on the prognosis of these patients. Methods it was an observational, prospective and analytic study. We analyzed all consecutive patients with MI who underwent coronary angiography admitted to our Hospital between 2016 and 2023; MINOCA patients were classified following the 2023 ESC Guidelines definition. The patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they had CKD or not. Median follow-up was 43 months [20-71]. Results we included 136 patients with MINOCA, of whom 11 (8.1%) had CKD. Patients with impaired kidney function were older and mostly male. They also exhibited a higher prevalence of classic cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. However, there were fewer smokers in this group. We did not find significant differences in coronary artery anatomy (smooth or small plaques) between both groups. Additionally, the majority of patients in both groups had preserved left ventricular function. Despite that, patients with CKD typically had ST segment elevation in the ECG and higher myocardial injury biomarkers’ levels as well as NT-proBNP. During hospitalization, patients without renal dysfunction had more complications (11.2% vs 0%, p=0.062) such as inotropic requirements, stroke or cardiogenic shock, but overall there were very few. In terms of treatment, it was fairly similar in both groups, although patients with kidney disease received diuretics significantly more often. Throughout the follow up, there were no significant differences in MACE (major adverse cardiovascular events) between death (27.3% vs 7.4%, p=0.06), readmission (10% vs 10.8%, p=1) or MI (0% vs 3.4%, p=1), but patients with CKD suffered more frequently from stroke (40% vs 4.2%, p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.3267