The role of coronary artery calcium score and european score2 in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease

Abstract Background There is limited evidence about the role of using coronary artery calcium (CAC) score in conjunction with the European SCORE2 (systematic coronary risk evaluation) for the identification of individuals at higher risk of cardiovascular disease. Purpose To evaluate the relationship between CAC score and the European SCORE2 for cardiovascular risk stratification in an asymptomatic population in primary prevention. Methods This is a preliminary analysis from a single-centre, prospective, randomised 1:1, controlled trial assessing the use of CAC score vs standard preventive strategies in asymptomatic individuals undergoing primary cardiovascular prevention. The 10-year risk of cardiovascular events was assessed with either SCORE2 (ages 45-69) or SCORE2-OP (ages 70-89). Subjects were classified as 1) low to moderate risk, 2) high risk, and 3) very high risk according to SCORE2/SCORE2-OP. CAC score was assessed by ECG gated low-dose computed tomography with no contrast administration. A CAC score of zero was considered to reclassify risk one level downward in high or very-high risk patients. CAC score ≥ 100 was used to reclassify risk one level upward in patients with low to moderate risk and a CAC score > 1000 to reclassify risk upward in subjects with high risk. Results A total of 1,252 participants: 627 in the CAC group and 625 in the control group, median age 55 yrs, 25th-75th 50-61 yrs, with availability of SCORE2 and SCORE2-OP were included in this analysis. SCORE2/SCORE 2-OP was similar in the CAC and control groups. Among the subjects in the CAC group, there was a highly significant difference in SCORE2/SCORE 2-OP between participants with CAC score = zero and those with CAC > zero (median 5.6, 25th-75th 3.6-8.55 vs 2.9, 1.8-4.6, p< 0.001) as well as between those with CAC ≥ 100 and those with CAC score < 100 [median 6.8, 25th-75th (10.3-4.5) vs 3.3 (2.0-5.3), p