Prevalence of coronary microvascular disease in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease

Abstract Background Six percent of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have MI with non-obstructed coronary artery disease (MINOCA). Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is common in angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), but its prevalence and severity in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Carrington, J, Moustafa, A, Lerman, A, Raphael, C E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Six percent of patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have MI with non-obstructed coronary artery disease (MINOCA). Coronary microvascular disease (CMD) is common in angina with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), but its prevalence and severity in MINOCA is undefined. Purpose Patients with CMD may have elevated risk of myocardial infarction despite no significant stenosis. We tested the hypothesis that patients with MINOCA have more significant burden of CMD than patients with ANOCA. Methods A retrospective case-control study was performed on patients who underwent invasive testing for signs of coronary ischemia and found to have non-obstructive disease (stenoses< 50%). Cases of MI were classified as MINOCA (n=87) and compared to patients with ANOCA (n=552). Patients with spontaneous coronary artery dissection, myocarditis, Takotsubo cardiomyopathy or prior atherothrombotic MI were excluded. Coronary catheterization was performed followed by invasive provocation testing with adenosine and acetylcholine using a Doppler flow wire. CMD was subdivided into endothelium-independent, defined as coronary flow reserve (CFR) < 2.5 with intra-coronary adenosine, and endothelium dependent, defined as < 50% increase in coronary blood flow with acetylcholine. Epicardial vasoconstriction > 90% with typical anginal symptoms was classified as epicardial vasospasm. Results There was no difference in age, sex or traditional coronary risk factors between the MINOCA and ANOCA groups (Table 1). Fifty (57%) of patients with MINOCA had type 2 MI secondary to supply-demand mismatch. Both MINOCA and suspected ANOCA patients had a high prevalence of CMD (71% vs 67%) and endothelium-independent CMD is more prevalent in MINOCA (64.5% vs 50.4%). Although odds of endothelium-dependent CMD were similar, the CFR within this group and CMD overall was worse in MINOCA patients (Figure 1). There was no difference in epicardial spasm. Conclusion Coronary microvascular disease and vasomotor dysfunction are common in patients with MINOCA, with a higher prevalence of endothelium-independent CMD and more severe CMD overall compared to patients with ANOCA. Treatment of CMD in patients with MINOCA may help reduce recurrence and warrants further investigation.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1287