Comparing outcomes in cardiogenic shock patients with ischemic versus nonischemic cardiomyopathy: A nationwide retrospective observational study

Abstract Introduction Ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy are common causes of heart failure. In our study, we compare the in-hospital outcomes between these two groups of patients with cardiogenic shock. Methods Data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between January 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2024-10, Vol.45 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Gupta, S, Thakkar, A, Carter, K, Choi, J, Saravia, S, Mahmood, K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy are common causes of heart failure. In our study, we compare the in-hospital outcomes between these two groups of patients with cardiogenic shock. Methods Data was obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database between January 2016 to December 2020. The study included all adult patients who were in cardiogenic shock and either ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) or non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Secondary outcomes were cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, acute respiratory failure, and acute renal failure, as well as the need for ventilators, dialysis, and ECMO. Results Among 168,591 adult patients who had cardiogenic shock during their hospitalization, 72,538 patients had either ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Among them, 31,854 (43.9%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) vs 40,684 (56.1%) who had nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). Patients with NICM had higher in-patient mortality (24.6% vs 26.1, aOR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.08-1.16, p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.1251