Effect of pre-procedural anticoagulation in patients undergoing ablation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia seen in a clinical setting. Patients have a high risk of stroke, especially in the first two years of diagnosis. Anticoagulation therapy is prescribed to patients with a high CHAD2S2-VASc score. Based on recent eviden...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Duhan, S, Taha, A, Keisham, B, Badu, I, Faisaluddin, M, Patel, H, Sandhyavenu, H
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common type of arrhythmia seen in a clinical setting. Patients have a high risk of stroke, especially in the first two years of diagnosis. Anticoagulation therapy is prescribed to patients with a high CHAD2S2-VASc score. Based on recent evidence, catheter ablation (CA) is emerging as the preferred first-line treatment of modality. The benefit of interruption of anticoagulation before CA is unclear. Interruption of anticoagulation and insertion of a foreign body during CA can lead to an increased risk of thromboembolism (TE). Anticoagulation is interrupted before the procedure to balance the risk of TE and bleeding. Objective To assess the risk of bleeding and TE in patients undergoing CA with uninterrupted versus interrupted anticoagulation. Methods We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) strategy to search PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception till January 2023. We included randomized controlled trials and excluded observational studies. The data was extracted from full texts. Data Random effects model and Mantel-Haenszel method were used to calculate pooled risk ratio and 95% confidence interval. Results A total of 10 studies were included, with 4,584 participants. The risk of TE [1.76; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.33, 9.46] and bleeding [1.10; 95% CI: 0.59, 2.05] did not change significantly with the interruption of all anticoagulation agents. Similarly, interruption of individual anticoagulants such as heparin [0.81, 95% CI: 0.19, 3.39], vitamin K antagonists (VKA) [9.21, 95% CI: 0.02, 5627.42], and direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) [1.36, 95% CI: 0.26, 7.23] did not show any change in the risk of TE. There was no significant change in the risk of bleeding with heparin discontinuation (Figure 1). Conclusion Our study supports recent trials such as Randomized Evaluation of Long-term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) and emerging data that support uninterrupted anticoagulation prior to ablation as there is no increased risk of bleeding or TE.
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehad655.393