Predictive role of intracoronary electrocardiography for procedural success in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction developing coronary no-reflow

Abstract Background The no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) is associated with increased mortality and development of heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although there is no definitive method for NRP treatment in current guidelines, methods to predict the success of procedures with NRP are also limited. There is a need for a practical, real-time method for predicting the outcome of procedures in NRP patients. Intracoronary electrocardiography (ic-ECG) which is simple, cost-effective, and a bedside indicator of myocardial ischemia, is proposed as a potential solution in this study. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine the potential of ic-ECG in predicting the success of primary percutaneous intervention (pPCI) in patients with STEMI and the development of coronary no-reflow. Methods This was a prospective investigation that included 71 patients diagnosed with acute anterior STEMI and underwent pPCI between November 2021 and May 2022. The patients were separated into two groups based on the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow grade criteria, with those having a grade of less than 3 defined as NRP. The NRP group was further analyzed to determine the relationship between the percentage of ST-segment resolution (STR) in the ic-ECG records taken during pPCI and short-term major adverse cardiovascular events rates and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery status. Results A total of 71 patients, with a mean age of 56.8 years and 76.1% of them being male, were included in the study. Of these patients, 26 were found to have developed NRP, while TIMI-3 flow was observed in 45 patients. In the NRP group, various parameters were found to be associated with LVEF recovery, such as peak troponin value (6267.8±2488.4 ng/ml vs 3244.6±3183 ng/ml, p=0.013) basal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (138.8±29.9 mg/dl vs 104.5±40 mg/dl, p=0.021), total cholesterol value (222.7±69.2 mg/dl vs 167.5±44.5 mg/dl, p=0.024), and ic-ECG STR level (21±22.3% vs 65.5±17%, p