“Actua” project: secondary prevention in patients at high-cardiovascular risk

Abstract Introduction It is acknowledged that secondary prevention for patients at high cardiovascular risk is suboptimal. Data from EUROASPIRE V registry showed that less than 50% of cardiovascular risks factors were controlled in this population. Purpose “Actua” study was designed to identify potential gaps regarding secondary prevention for patients at very-high cardiovascular risk. The main objective was to assess differences between scientific evidence and clinical practice through an agreement/disagreement analysis of a questionnaire with statements based on clinical guidelines and expert recommendations. Methods A qualitative analysis based on Delphi methodology was conducted. The study was divided into 2 phases. In phase 1, doctors were asked to show agreement or disagreement with the statements presented by the scientific committee through a Likert 5-points-scale. Consensus was stablished according to consensus method of Tastle. Results were expressed as a percentage (%CNS) which shows power of agreement or disagreement consensus. CNS>70% were considered as consensus. In phase 2, same doctors were asked again about the statements with no consensus or high dispersion in previous phase, after disclosing results in phase 1. In addition, a third questionnaire was conducted to asses socio-demographic data of the sample. Results 246 and 265 questionnaires were conducted in phase 1 and 2 respectively. 90% of respondents in phase 1 and 94,3% in phase 2 answered all the questions. Statements which showed consensus among participants are represented in table 1. As reported, there was consensus in goals for blood pressure (