Differences in left atrial stain, endothelial glycocalyx and arterial elasticity between ESUS, lacunar and atherosclerotic type of stroke

Abstract Background and purpose Patients with stroke are at high risk to develop cardiovascular complications. We assessed endothelial glycocalyx, aortic elastic properties, left atrial and ventricular function in patients with lacunar, atherosclerotic and stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Metho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Ikonomidis, I, Katogiannis, K, Frogoudaki, A, Vrettou, A R, Thymis, J, Kostelli, G, Kountouri, A, Korakas, E, Michalopoulou, E, Vythoulkas, D, Koliou, G, Simou, A, Benas, D, Lambadiari, V, Tsivgoulis, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and purpose Patients with stroke are at high risk to develop cardiovascular complications. We assessed endothelial glycocalyx, aortic elastic properties, left atrial and ventricular function in patients with lacunar, atherosclerotic and stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Methods In 68 patients (age 56,1±10.9) with acute cerebral stroke (22 lacunar, 19 atherosclerotic and 27 ESUS) and 20 controls with similar risk factors, we measured: (1) perfused boundary region (PBR) of the sublingual arterial microvessels (range 5–25 μm), a marker inversely related with glycocalyx thickness, (2) pulse wave velocity (PWV), central systolic blood pressure (cSBP), and augmentation index (AIx), (3) LA volume and strain using speckle-tracking imaging, and (4) left ventricular global longitudinal strain. Results Compared with controls, patients with stroke had higher PWV (11,38±3,62 vs 9,51±1,57 m/sec, p=0,045), PBR (2,10±0,27 vs 1,94±,020, p=0,039) and central SBP (139,64±26,31 vs 116,36±37,23 mmHg, p=0,039), while ventricular (−17,902±3,77 vs −19,87±1,17%, p=0,025) and atrial deformation (24,8±9,99 vs 39,050±2,08%, p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.2075