Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with left main coronary artery pseudobifurcation lesions: 5-years follow-up

Abstract Aims To increase the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with ostium coronary artery lesions: left arterial descending (LAD) or left circumflex (LCx) – pseudobifurcations. Methods 220 patients were included in the study. Inclusion criteria: ostium atherosl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2021-10, Vol.42 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Maximkin, D, Shugushev, Z, Faybushevich, A, Chepurnoy, A, Volkov, S, Gitelzon, E, Korobkov, A, Bagin, S, Veretnik, G, Bolivougui, J M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims To increase the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with ostium coronary artery lesions: left arterial descending (LAD) or left circumflex (LCx) – pseudobifurcations. Methods 220 patients were included in the study. Inclusion criteria: ostium atheroslerotic lesions of left arterial descending (LAD) or left circumflex (LCx) >70% according to angiography and optical coherence tomography (OCT); myocardial ischemia according the FFR measurement. According OCT data, all patients were devoiced into 2 groups. In I group (n=110) according to OCT, atherosclerotic plaque spread from the ostium of LAD and/or LCx to the left main coronary artery (LMCA), and in group II (n=110) - the plaque did not spread into the LMCA. In Group I all patients were initially treated with “Provisional T” stenting of the LMCA, and in Group II – precision stenting of the ostium LAD or LCx. Primary endpoints: frequency of MACE (death, MI, revascularizations). Results The long-term results after 5-years were observe in 98 patients from group I and 92 patients from group II. The survival rate of patients from group I and II, free from cardiac events, were 94.9±4.03 and 81.5±3.23, respectively (p0.05). Myocardial infarction were observed in 2 (2.04%) patients from group I and 5 (5.43%) patients from group II (p>0.05). The target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 3 patients (3.06%) in group I, and in 12 patients (13.04%) in group II (p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab724.1227