Impact of programming in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients with long-term follow-up: findings from the UMBRELLA study

Abstract Background Data about the penetration of current ICD programming recommendations in a real-life setting are lacking. Purpose To assess how modern-era ICD patients are programmed and to study the relationship between programming and ICD therapies in large cohort of Spanish patients. Methods UMBRELLA (NTC01561144) is a prospective, multicentre, nationwide study of ICD patients followed by remote monitoring. ICD programming was performed according to regular clinical practice at each site and it was automatically stored through the remote monitoring system. Arrhythmic events were also automatically stored and reviewed in a blinded process performed by a committee of experts. The study outcomes were appropriate ICD therapies and inappropriate shocks (IS). Results The study population consisted of 4296 patients implanted with an ICD from 2005 to 2017 (61.9±12.9 years, ischaemic cardiomyopathy in 50% and dilated cardiomyopathy in 22.7% of population). Primary prevention (PP) was the main indication (64.2%). At implant, 66.4% of patients had LVEF ≤35% and 18.9% had LVEF >50%. Majority of patients (52.4%) presented with narrow QRS (150 ms in 26.7% of population. Single-chamber, dual-chamber and cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) devices were implanted in 47.2%, 22.6% and 30.2% of population, respectively. At first remote transmission, single zone detection programming was only enabled in 43.2% of population (52.6% among PP patients), while the remaining patients (56.8%) had a ventricular tachycardia zone enabled, despite the ventricular fibrillation (VF) zone (73.8% among secondary prevention patients). Delayed high-rate detection programming (detection interval