Increased risk of coronary plaque vulnerabilization following COVID-19 infection, identified by elevated FAI index of pericoronary inflammation at coronary CT

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): This research has been funded by the research grant Intel-FAT, proposal registration code PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2020-2861, contract number PCE 206/2021, Project funded by the European Union and the Government of Romania through the Ministry of European Funds, and the Doctoral School of the “George Emil Palade” University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, Romania. Background Inflammation plays an essential role in all stages of atherosclerosis, with stable plaques characterized by chronic inflammation and vulnerable or ruptured plaques exhibiting "active" inflammation. COVID infection may significantly increase systemic inflammation, but the role of SARS COV-2 infection on local plaque vulnerability is still not elucidated. Mapping the PCAT - FAI on routine CCTA can detect coronary artery inflammation non-invasively by measuring changes in the composition of pericoronary fat. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 infection on CAD in patients who underwent CCTA examinations for chest pain in the early stages after infection, using the new AI - powered CaRi-Heart® solution. Methods In our study, we included 158 patients (mean age was 61.63 ± 10.14 years) with chest pain and low to intermediate clinical likelihood of CAD, who underwent 128-slice CCTA for assessment of coronary anatomy, atherosclerosis, and determination of FAI – Score. The study population was divided into two main groups: Group 1 (n = 75) – patients who had a COVID-19 infection a few months prior to their CCTA examination, and Group 2 (n = 83) – patients adjusted for age and gender, who did not have a COVID-19 infection. Results The FAI - Score was consistently higher in the non COVID-19 group: LAD (11.61 ± 7.60 vs. 9.32 ± 6.00, p = 0.05), LCX (12.43 ± 6.65 vs. 10.48 ± 6.24, p = 0.05), RCA (15.40 ± 11.36 vs. 14.54 ± 12.17, p = ns), the average FAI - Score (12.81 ± 8.28 vs. 10.47 ± 7.19, p = 0.001). For the FAI-Score Centile, the overall pattern shifts significantly, as the values for all three coronary arteries are higher for the subjects in the COVID-19 positive group, as follows: LAD (0.66 ± 0.29 vs. 0.58 ± 0.28, p = 0.05), LCX (0.79 ± 0.16 vs. 0.68 ± 0.26, p = 0.03), RCA (0.83 ± 0.20 vs. 0.68 ± 0.29, p = 0.05). In both cases, the CaRi Heart® Risk (p < 0.0001) and the Duke Score (p < 0.0001) had significantly higher values for t