HFpEF score discriminates severity of cardiovascular profile in asymptomatic treated hypertensive patients: the campania salute network
Abstract Background The heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) score is easy to use and potentially useful to discriminate HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea. HFpEF score may be expressed also as probability to have HFpEF. Purpose We investigated whether a high HFpEF score can i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
The heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) score is easy to use and potentially useful to discriminate HFpEF from noncardiac causes of dyspnea. HFpEF score may be expressed also as probability to have HFpEF.
Purpose
We investigated whether a high HFpEF score can identify specific cardiovascular (CV) profile in treated hypertensive patients even without dyspnea.
Methods
From September to December 2019, we consecutively enrolled treated hypertensive patients without dyspnea, with normal left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (>50%), and chronic kidney disease of no more than stage III. In addition to standard echocardiographic parameters we evaluated: 1) inappropriate LV mass, identified as a percent of predicted LV mass >128%, 2) myocardial energetic efficiency as the ratio of stroke volume to heart rate normalized by LV mass (MEEi), and 3) an estimate of arterial stiffness, i.e. the ratio of pulse pressure and stroke index (by allometric normalization by height), as previously reported. The probability of HFpEF was calculated from the HFpEF score, using body mass index, pulmonary systolic pressure, mitral E/E' ratio, age, and history or evidence of atrial fibrillation.
Results
188 patients with complete data were analyzed (42% women, age 61±14 years, 9% diabetic). Patients were then divided into 3 groups according to HFpEF probability tertiles and compared by ANOVA and trend analysis (Table 1).
Conclusions
Probability of HFpEF using HFpEF score and non-standard echocardiographic parameters identify worse CV profile in treated hypertensive patients without dyspnea.
Table 1
Variable
HFpEF probability
p
Variable
0–29 (N=62)
30–50% (N=64)
>50% (N=62)
Female sex (%)
40
31
55
0.026
Diabetes (%)
0
14
13
0.011
EPI_GFR (ml/min/1.73m2)
87±14
75±15
74±12 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2798 |