Long-term outcomes of the micronet-covered stent system routine use for carotid revsacularization in stroke prevention: PARADIGM-Extend 5 year evidence

Abstract Background Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging indicates that micronet-covered embolic prevention stent system effectively minimizes peri-procedural and prevents lesion-related post-procedural cerebral embolism in carotid artery stenting but long-term clinical evidence is missing....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Mazurek, A, Borratynska, A, Tomaszewski, T, Lesniak-Sobelga, A, Wilkolek, P, Gancarczyk, U, Brozda, M, Sobieraj, E, Sikorska, M, Czyz, L, Urbanczyk, M, Trystula, M, Drazkiewicz, T, Podolec, P, Musialek, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging indicates that micronet-covered embolic prevention stent system effectively minimizes peri-procedural and prevents lesion-related post-procedural cerebral embolism in carotid artery stenting but long-term clinical evidence is missing. Purpose To provide long-term clinical and duplex ultrasound evaluation of safety and efficacy of the system use in consecutive carotid revascularization patients. Methods PARADIGM-EXTEND is in all-comer, all-referrals-tracked study with no exclusion criteria other than lack of NeuroVascular Team-determined indication. Clinically asymptomatic patients receive revascularization only in case of increased-stroke-risk characteristics. Adverse events are independently adjudicated. Results Currently 451 patients (48–87 years, 59% symptomatic, 127 women) with 490 arteries crossed the first follow-up window of 30 days. There has been 100% micronet-covered embolic prevention stent system use (ie, no other stent type/s used throughout study). Proximal/distal intra-procedural neuroprotection use was 38.3%/61.7%. Large balloon/high-pressure stent optimization was routine, leading to a single-digit (mean 6.9%) residual diameter stenosis. Independent neurologist and duplex evaluation are before and after revascularization (48h and 30 days, then yearly). Peri-procedural death or major ischemic stroke rate was 0%. One event (prior infarct scar asymptomatic extension in prolonged hypotension course) was adjudicated as minor stroke (0.22%), and there was 1 periprocedural MI (type 2, in 2-vessel non-revascularizable CTO; 0.22%). By 30 days there were no further ischaemic strokes (0%) but there was 1 haemorrhagic transformation that led to death (0.22%) and 1 bleeding-related death (0.22%). Thus total 30-day death/stroke was 0.66%, and total death/stroke/MI was 0.88%. By 60 months there were 3 contralateral, 1 ipsilateral (device-unrelated), and 2 posterior circulation strokes. Baseline internal carotid artery velocities were 3.72±1.25 and 0.63±0.69 m/s (peak-systolic and end-diastolic). Post-procedural in-stent velocities were normal and remained normal throughout the 60-month follow-up period: 0.78±040 and 0.21±0.10 (1y); 0.75±0.36 0.19±0.09 (2y); 0.75±0,35 and 0.21±0.09 (3y); 0.72±0.27 and 0.20±0.07 (4y); 0.79±0.58 and 0.21±0.11m/s (5y). There were 2 in-stent restenoses by 1y (including 1 that occurred with de novo neck radiotherapy) and 1 other by 2y (total 2y in-stent restenos
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.2404