Right ventricular pulmonary vascular coupling in secondary tricuspid regurgitation: a pressure volume loop study
Abstract Introduction The severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) predicts outcome of patients with left heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In these patients sTR predominantly occurs as a result of secondary pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, more than 46% of patien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Introduction
The severity of secondary tricuspid regurgitation (sTR) predicts outcome of patients with left heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In these patients sTR predominantly occurs as a result of secondary pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, more than 46% of patients with severe PH have only mild or none sTR. In this study we tested the hypothesis that intrinsic right ventricular (RV) contractility adaptation to the pulmonary arterial (PA) vascular load (RV-PA-coupling) is associated with the presence and severity of sTR.
Methods
In 110 patients with HFrEF (a post-hoc analysis of the Magdeburger CRT Responder Trial, DRKS00011133) we quantified the RV intrinsic contractility response (end-systolic elastance, Ees) to pulmonary vascular afterload (arterial elastance, Ea) and its coupling ratio (RV-PA coupling ratio: Ees/Ea) by the RV pressure-volume loop catheter technique at baseline, and combined it with echocardiography-derived parameter of sTR presence and severity and RV function.
Results
Echocardiography at baseline demonstrated no or trace TR (TR0) in 67 patients (61%), mild TR (TR1) in 23 (21%), moderate TR (TR2) in 11 (10%), and severe TR (TR3) in 9 (8%). The transition from TR0 to TR1 was characterized by a pronounced drop of the RV-PA coupling ratio (TR0: Ees/Ea= 0.88, 0.67–1.1 vs. TR1: Ees/Ea= 0.48, 0.3–0.83, p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1903 |