Novel low-delta value troponin algorithms have good precision for rule-out of NSTE-ACS
Abstract Background Rapid rule-out algorithms for non-ST-elevation infarction (NSTEMI) may be beneficial for logistics in the emergency room. Current algorithms are designed to rule-out NSTEMI, but do not differentiate between unstable angina (UAP) in need of revascularization and non-cardiac chest...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
Rapid rule-out algorithms for non-ST-elevation infarction (NSTEMI) may be beneficial for logistics in the emergency room. Current algorithms are designed to rule-out NSTEMI, but do not differentiate between unstable angina (UAP) in need of revascularization and non-cardiac chest pain patients (NCCP) who could be discharged. Recent improvements in analytical precision of high sensitivity troponin (cTn) assays allow for trialing algorithms with very small delta values.
Purpose
Could the use of lower delta values produce rule-out algorithms for NSTE-ACS with a false negative rate of ≤5%, and a sufficient high rule-out rate of patients with NCCP.
Method
927 patients with suspected NSTE-ACS were consecutively included. Serum samples were collected at 0, 3 and 8–12 hours. The final diagnosis was adjudicated by two independent cardiologists based on all clinical data including routine cTnT. The 0- and 3-hour samples were additionally measured for cTnIand cTnI from Singulex Clarity System (cTnI(sgx)). The diagnostic performance to rule-out NSTE-ACS was compared between one low-delta value algorithm from each assay (cTnT, cTnI and cTnT).
Results
The prevalence of NSTEMI was 13.4%, UAP 11.4% and NCCP 60%. Median age was 63 years, 60% males. Fig. 1 shows baseline and 3-hour delta cTn values for the UAP and NCCP patients for the three different assays. The baseline cTn value differed significantly between UAP and NCCP for all assays, p value 30% of NCCP patients were ruled out. The cTnT algorithm had the best performance with a significant higher AUC compared to the cTnI(sgx) algorithm.
Table 1. Diagnostic performance for the algorithms.All numbers are percentages
0/3 hour rule-out algorithm (N=927)
Sensitivity
NPV
Specificity
PPV
AUC
TnI(sgx)0 |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0195-668X 1522-9645 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.1684 |