Guideline-directed medical therapies for comorbidities among patients with atrial fibrillation: results from GARFIELD-AF

Abstract Introduction The GARFIELD-AF registry is a prospective, multicentre, observational study of adults with recently diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one risk factor for stroke. In GARFIELD-AF the absolute risk reduction of mortality associated with anticoagulation i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Camm, A.J, Steffel, J, Virdone, S, Bassand, J.-P, Fitzmaurice, D.A, Fox, K.A.A, Goldhaber, S.Z, Goto, S, Haas, S, Turpie, A.G.G, Verheugt, F.W.A, Misselwitz, F, Kayani, G, Pieper, K.S, Kakkar, A.K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction The GARFIELD-AF registry is a prospective, multicentre, observational study of adults with recently diagnosed non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and at least one risk factor for stroke. In GARFIELD-AF the absolute risk reduction of mortality associated with anticoagulation is far greater than the apparent absolute risk reduction in (ischemic) stroke. One potential explanation is improved treatment, with the use of comprehensive guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT), in patients with AF receiving oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. The objectives were to identify the potential relationships between anticoagulation status, GDMT use and clinical outcomes. Methods Use of GDMT was determined on the basis of published European Society for Cardiology guidelines operative between 2010 and 2016. We explored the use of GDMT in patients enrolled in GARFIELD-AF (March 2010-Aug 2016) with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2 and with one or more of five comorbidities–coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension and peripheral vascular disease. Association between GDMT use and clinical outcomes events was evaluated with Cox-proportional hazards models. The models included stratification by all possible combinations of the five comorbidities used to define GDMT eligibility. Results The study population comprised of 39,946 patients who had one or more comorbidities (3238 [8.1%] received none of the GDMT, 17,398 [43.6%] received some, and 19,310 [48.3%] received all of the GDMT for which they were eligible). Patients on OAC tended to receive all the GDMTs more frequently compared to patients on no OAC (50.2% vs 44.8%, respectively). Comprehensive GDMT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.89 [0.80–0.99]) and non-cardiovascular mortality (0.80 [0.68–0.95]) compared to inadequate or no GDMT but was not associated with a lower risk of stroke (HR: 1.04 (0.88–1.24)] (Figure). The effect of OAC was beneficial for mortality and stroke risk whether receiving comprehensive GDMT or not. Conclusion OAC therapy is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, non-cardiovascular mortality and stroke/SE in comparison with no OAC, irrespective of GDMT use in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2. Although the use of GDMT is associated with a significant reduction in mortality, there is little evidence that this explains the decrease in mortality with the use of OAC. GDMT use at two years of follow-up Funding Acknowledgement Type
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0631