Who is too old for epicardial fat volume quantification?

Abstract Introduction Epicardial adipose tissue has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) and was recently shown to be an independent predictor of AF relapse rate and severity after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its impact in older patients hasn't been an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European heart journal 2020-11, Vol.41 (Supplement_2)
Hauptverfasser: Brizido, C, Matos, D, Ferreira, A.M, Sousa, J.A, Freitas, P, Presume, J, Rodrigues, G.R, Carmo, J, Costa, F.M, Carmo, P, Cavaco, D, Morgado, F.B, Adragao, P, Mendes, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction Epicardial adipose tissue has been implicated in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation (AF) and was recently shown to be an independent predictor of AF relapse rate and severity after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, its impact in older patients hasn't been analyzed. The aim of this study was to assess the relative importance of pericardial fat in an older population of patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods Single-center retrospective study of symptomatic drug-resistant AF patients undergoing PVI from November/2015 to June/2019. Baseline demographics, clinical and imaging data including cardiac CT and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Population was dichotomized according to age above or below 70 years of age and groups were compared. Epicardial fat volume was quantified by contrast-enhanced cardiac CT using a semi-automated method. The study endpoint was symptomatic and/or documented AF recurrence after a 3-month blanking period. Results We assessed 575 patients (354 males, mean age 61±11 years, 449 paroxysmal AF), 145 of which were 70 or older. Compared to the younger cohort, these patients had an higher prevalence of women, lower BMI (27 kg/m2 [IQR 24–30] vs 28 kg/m2 [IQR 25–30] kg/m2, p=0.012), higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (3 [IQR 2–4] vs 1 [IQR 1–2], p
ISSN:0195-668X
1522-9645
DOI:10.1093/ehjci/ehaa946.0570