P349 Infliximab in inflammatory bowel disease: Is premedication necessary?

Abstract Background The use of infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with a 1–6% risk of infusion reactions. The usefulness of premedication with corticosteroids, paracetamol and/or antihistamines is controversial. The aim of this study is to assess, in IBD patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2020-01, Vol.14 (Supplement_1), p.S334-S335
Hauptverfasser: Núñez, P, Figueroa, C, Flores, L, Ibáñez, P, Kronberg, U, Lubascher, J, Pizarro, G, Quera, R, Simian, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background The use of infliximab (IFX) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with a 1–6% risk of infusion reactions. The usefulness of premedication with corticosteroids, paracetamol and/or antihistamines is controversial. The aim of this study is to assess, in IBD patients on IFX, whether there are differences in secondary reactions to the infusion between those who use premedication or not. Methods A retrospective cohort study was performed identifying patients with a diagnosis of IBD who received IFX at a tertiary centre in Santiago-Chile, since 2009. Acute reactions were defined as those that occurred in the first 24 h post-infusion and late reactions for more than 24 h. Infusion reactions were classified as mild, moderate and severe. Descriptive and association statistics were used (χ 2; p < 0.05). Results Sixty-four patients were included with 1,263 infusions in total, 52% men (characteristics in Table 1). Median infusions per patient were 22 (2–66). All induction infusions were administered with premedication and in maintenance, 57% of them. Premedication was given with hydrocortisone, chlorphenamine and paracetamol. Flow chart according to premedication use or not is shown in Figure 1. In the maintenance group, there were 10/718 (1.4%) infusion reactions with premedication and 3/358 (0.8%) without it, non-significant differences (p = 0.432). In the induction group, there were 8/187 (4%) infusion reactions, significantly higher when compared with both maintenance groups (Figure 2). Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients on infliximab therapy n = 64 patients (%) Diagnosis 23 (36) UC 40 (63) CD 1 (1) Non-classified IBD Age (median; range) 34 (16–74) Years of disease (median; range) 5 (0 – 49) Difference between diagnostic and use of IFX (median; range) 4.5 (0 – 38) Biological therapies 57 (89) Naïve 3 (5) Previous use of Adalimumab Previous use of Infliximab (more than 1 year ago) 4 (6) Infliximab infusions Induction (n = 187) 167 (89) Standard or conventional Optimised (10 mg/kg or accelerated 0-1-4 weeks) 20 (11) Maintenance (n = 1076) 845 (79) Standard or conventional Optimised (10 mg/kg / 4–6 weeks) 231 (21) Figure 1. Flow chart according to premedication use or not. Figure 2. Comparison of infusion reactions rates due to IFX administration with or without premedication. Conclusion In this cohort, premedication use in maintenance phase was not effective at reducing the rate of infusion reactions du
ISSN:1873-9946
1876-4479
DOI:10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjz203.478