P1084 Persistence and efficacy of Ustekinumab in Crohn's disease after antiTNF failure. May the response of the second biologic therapy be better than the first one?
Abstract Background After antiTNF failure, a second antiTNF in Crohn's disease (CD) is effective to achieve and maintain remission, but only50% remain with the drug after 12 months of treatment. Ustekinumab (UST) has a better persistence as second-line treatment and is effective to induce and m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Crohn's and colitis 2024-01, Vol.18 (Supplement_1), p.i1949-i1950 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract
Background
After antiTNF failure, a second antiTNF in Crohn's disease (CD) is effective to achieve and maintain remission, but only50% remain with the drug after 12 months of treatment. Ustekinumab (UST) has a better persistence as second-line treatment and is effective to induce and maintain long-term remission.
Methods
Retrospective and observational study retrieved from a prospective database of Crohn's disease patients treated with UST, after approval of Research Ethics Committee. Data were collected at the beginning of treatment and after 4, 8, 16, 24 weeks, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months and at the end of follow-up (UST discontinuation or March 2023 if treatment continues).
Primary Objective
evaluate the persistence with UST and clinical (Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1873-9946 1876-4479 |
DOI: | 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.1214 |