538. COMPARISON OF EARLY POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES OF CERVICAL ANASTOMOSIS TO HIGH INTRATHORACIC ANASTOMOSIS AMONG PATIENTS WITH UPPER THORACIC ESOPHAGEAL CANCER

Abstract Background For upper thoracic esophageal cancer, esophagectomy combined with cervical esophagogastrostomy (cervical anastomosis, CA) and three-field lymph node dissection (3FLND) has been proposed as the standard surgical approach. However, while CA provides sufficient length of proximal resection margins, it is associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications such as anastomotic leaks, recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury, and increased mortality. As an alternative, high-intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis (high-ITA) with 3FLND has been performed. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and limitations of high-ITA compared to conventional CA in terms of early postoperative outcomes. Methods A total of 232 patients, who underwent curative esophagogastrostomy with 3FLND and either of high-intrathoracic anastomosis (high-ITA) or cervical anastomosis (CA) for upper thoracic esophageal cancer a tertiary hospital from January 2010 to December 2021. Collected data from medical records were analyzed retrospectively regarding morbidity and mortality rates. The primary end point was recurrence. Anastomotic leak, RLN palsy, hospital stay, and 90-day mortality and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using Chi-squared test, Fisher’s exact test, and T-test. The risk of mortality and recurrence were analyzed using Cox-proportional hazard regression with a median follow-up of 39.1(IQR 17.8, 80.2) months. Results Among the fifty patients with high-ITA and 182 patients with CA, the high-ITA group reported fewer anastomotic leaks (6.0% vs. 19.8%, p=0.02) and a shorter hospital stay (median 12days vs. 15 days, p