389. WILL SYNCHRONOUS ESOPHAGEAL AND LUNG RESECTION INCREASE THE INCIDENCE OF ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS? A MULTICENTER RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Abstract Background Reports on combined resection for synchronous lung lesions and esophageal cancer (CRLE) cases are rare and mostly individual cases. Furthermore, the feasibility of CRLE has always been a controversial topic. In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of CRL...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diseases of the esophagus 2024-09, Vol.37 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Long-Qi, Liu, Yixin, Yang, YuShang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Reports on combined resection for synchronous lung lesions and esophageal cancer (CRLE) cases are rare and mostly individual cases. Furthermore, the feasibility of CRLE has always been a controversial topic. In the current study, we retrospectively analyzed the feasibility of CRLE and established an individualized prediction model for esophageal anastomotic leaks after CRLE by performing a multicenter retrospective study. Methods Patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2009 and June 2021 were extracted from a 4-centre retrospectively maintained database, and those with CRLE at the same setting were matched in a 1:2 propensity score matched (PSM) ratio to esophagectomy alone (EA) patients. A nomogram was then established based on the variables involved in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Internal validation of the nomogram was conducted utilizing Bootstrap resampling. Decision and clinical impact curve analysis were computed to assess the practical clinical utility of the nomogram. A prognosis analysis for CRLE and EA patients by Kaplan-Meier curves was conducted. Results Of the 7152 esophagectomies, 216 cases of CRLE were eligible, and 1:2 ratio PSM EA patients were matched. The incidence of anastomotic leaks following CRLE increased significantly (P=0.035). The results of the multivariate analysis indicated the leaks varied according to the type of lung resection (anatomic > wedge resection, P=0.016) and site of resected lobe (upper > middle/low lobe; P=0.027), and a nomogram was established to predict the occurrence of leaks accurately (AUC=0.786). Although no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) was observed in the CRLE group (P=0.070), a trend toward lower survival rates was noted. Further analysis revealed that combined upper lobe anatomic resection was significantly associated with reduced OS (P=0.027). Conclusion Our study confirms that CRLE is feasible but comes with a significantly increased risk of anastomotic leaks and a concerning trend of reduced survival, particularly when upper lobe anatomic resections are performed. These findings highlight the need for careful patient selection and surgical planning when considering CRLE.
ISSN:1120-8694
1442-2050
DOI:10.1093/dote/doae057.146