Quantitative Determination of Vapor-Phase Compound A in Sevoflurane Anesthesia Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry

During low-flow or closed-circuit anesthesia with the fluorinated inhalation anesthetic sevoflurane, compound A, an olefinic degradation product with known nephrotoxicity in rats, is generated on contact with alkaline CO(2) adsorbents. To evaluate compound A formation and thus potential sevoflurane...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical chemistry (Baltimore, Md.) Md.), 2001-02, Vol.47 (2), p.281-291
Hauptverfasser: Bouche, Marie-Paule L.A, Van Bocxlaer, Jan F.P, Rolly, Georges, Versichelen, Linda F.M, Struys, Michel M.R.F, Mortier, Eric, De Leenheer, Andre P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:During low-flow or closed-circuit anesthesia with the fluorinated inhalation anesthetic sevoflurane, compound A, an olefinic degradation product with known nephrotoxicity in rats, is generated on contact with alkaline CO(2) adsorbents. To evaluate compound A formation and thus potential sevoflurane toxicity, a reliable and reproducible assay for quantitative vapor-phase compound A determination was developed. Compound A concentrations were measured by fully automated capillary gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with cryofocusing. Calibrators of compound A in the vapor phase were prepared from liquid volumetric dilutions of stock solutions of compound A and sevoflurane in ethyl acetate. 1,1,1-Trifluoro-2-iodoethane was chosen as an internal standard. The resulting quantitative method was fully validated. A linear response over a clinically useful concentration interval (0.3-75 microL/L) was obtained. Specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy conformed with current analytical requirements. The CVs were 4.1-10%, the limit of detection was 0.1 microL/L, and the limit of quantification was 0.3 microL/L. Analytical recoveries were 100.6% +/- 10.1%, 102.5% +/- 7.3%, and 99.0% +/- 4.1% at 0.5, 10, and 75 microL/L, respectively. The method described was used to determine compound A concentrations during simulated closed-circuit conditions. Some of the resulting data are included, illustrating the practical applicability of the proposed analytical approach. A simple, fully automated, and reliable quantitative analytical method for determination of compound A in air was developed. A solution was established for sampling, calibration, and chromatographic separation of volatiles in an area complicated by limited availability of sample volume and low concentrations of the analyte.
ISSN:0009-9147
1530-8561
DOI:10.1093/clinchem/47.2.281