A Comparison of Methods to Determine Benzene in Gasoline Boiling Range Material

Several chromatographic methods are compared for the determination of benzene in a set of 200 samples containing gasoline boiling range material. These methods included ASTM D 3606, a liquid chromatographic method, and a multicolumn PIONA (paraffins, isoparaffins, aromatics, naphthalenes, and olefin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of chromatographic science 1992-01, Vol.30 (1), p.32-39
Hauptverfasser: Pauls, R.E., Weight, G.J., Munowitz, P.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Several chromatographic methods are compared for the determination of benzene in a set of 200 samples containing gasoline boiling range material. These methods included ASTM D 3606, a liquid chromatographic method, and a multicolumn PIONA (paraffins, isoparaffins, aromatics, naphthalenes, and olefins) method. In addition, a coupled capillary method is evaluated for a smaller set of samples. Although a small bias is detected among these methods, the extent of disagreement among methods is not large. For example, a least-squares fit of D 3606 results (x-axis) against LC results (y-axis) gives a slope of 0.99 and an intercept of -0.03 wt% benzene. In this evaluation, the repeatability of D 3606 is approximately three times better than that of the LC method.
ISSN:0021-9665
1945-239X
DOI:10.1093/chromsci/30.1.32