Postoperative analgesic effect of intravenous (i.v.) clonidine compared with clonidine administration in wound infiltration for open cholecystectomy††The work has been presented at 69th Annual National Scientific Congress of the Australian Society of Anaesthetists, Melbourne, Australia
This randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of clonidine administered intravenously or in wound infiltration with bupivacaine. Sixty adults of ASA grade I–II undergoing open cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1 (control...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2013-10, Vol.111 (4), p.656-661 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | This randomized double-blind study was designed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of clonidine administered intravenously or in wound infiltration with bupivacaine.
Sixty adults of ASA grade I–II undergoing open cholecystectomy were randomly allocated into three groups. Group 1 (control group) patients received wound infiltration with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at the end of surgery. Group 2 patients received 3 μg kg−1 clonidine intravenously after resection of gall bladder plus wound infiltration with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. Group 3 patients received wound infiltration with 3 μg kg−1 clonidine with 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. A standard general anaesthesia technique was used. Postoperative analgesia was provided with i.v. diclofenac and morphine on demand. Postoperative pain, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia and total morphine consumption during 24 h after operation was recorded.
Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly less in patients receiving clonidine by either route when compared with the control group (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0912 1471-6771 |
DOI: | 10.1093/bja/aet130 |