A-108 Inflammatory Biomarkers Link Perceived Stress With Metabolic Dysregulation

Abstract Objective: Psychological stress has been identified as a risk factor for several metabolic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes. However, the intermediate pathways underlying this relationship are not well understood. Inflammatory responses may be one process by w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of clinical neuropsychology 2022-08, Vol.37 (6), p.1260-1260
Hauptverfasser: Jurgens, Savana M, Prieto, Sarah, Hayes, Jasmeet P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective: Psychological stress has been identified as a risk factor for several metabolic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and type II diabetes. However, the intermediate pathways underlying this relationship are not well understood. Inflammatory responses may be one process by which stress leads to metabolic dysregulation. Prior work has shown that chronic stress is associated with elevated systemic inflammation and that altered inflammatory activity contributes to the pathogenesis of metabolic disease. The current analyses tested this theory by examining inflammation as a pathway by which perceived stress affects metabolic health. Methods: Data from the Midlife in the United States Study (MIDUS) (N = 863; Mean age = 52.72) provided measures of perceived stress, inflammatory biomarkers [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6)] and metabolic health markers. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to confirm the fit of a hierarchical model of metabolic dysregulation in our sample. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to test the assumption that stress is linked to metabolic dysregulation through inflammation. Results: The CFA of metabolic dysregulation demonstrated excellent goodness of fit [RMSEA = 0.040 (95% CI = 0.036–0.062); CFI = 0.973; SRMR = 0.082]. SEM supported the proposed model which included perceived stress, inflammation and the metabolic latent variable with age and sex as covariates [RMSEA = 0.082 (95% CI = 0.075–0.089); CFI = 0.898, SMSR = 0.085]. The indirect pathway linking stress to metabolic dysregulation via inflammation was significant [B = 0.029, z = 2.812, p 
ISSN:1873-5843
1873-5843
DOI:10.1093/arclin/acac060.108