Drawing Adverse Inferences from the Non-production of Evidence
ARBITRATING PARTIES, no less than litigating parties, require evidence to prove their cases and to challenge the factual bases of their adversaries' contentions. That evidence, however, often rests exclusively in the hands of adverse parties, which lack obligation or incentive to divulge harmfu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Arbitration international 2006-12, Vol.22 (4), p.549-571 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ARBITRATING PARTIES, no less than litigating parties, require evidence to prove their cases and to challenge the factual bases of their adversaries' contentions. That evidence, however, often rests exclusively in the hands of adverse parties, which lack obligation or incentive to divulge harmful information. Arbitrators, moreover, lack 'imperium' and typically cannot compel parties to produce evidence. Judicial assistance also has its limits, as obtaining documents from courts is rarely an effective remedy in international arbitration.' Arbitrating parties thus risk being deprived, unfairly, of the ability to prosecute or defend against claims. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0957-0411 1875-8398 |
DOI: | 10.1093/arbitration/22.4.549 |