The flexibility in choosing distinct Green’s functions for the boundary wall method: waveguides and billiards
The boundary wall method (BWM) is a general purpose protocol to treat boundary value problems for wave equations, specially Helmholtz’s (the case addressed here). Similarly to most approaches, the BWM may be computationally demanding for large borders C , at which the wave function must satisfy spec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. A, Mathematical and theoretical Mathematical and theoretical, 2022-04, Vol.55 (17), p.175201 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The boundary wall method (BWM) is a general purpose protocol to treat boundary value problems for wave equations, specially Helmholtz’s (the case addressed here). Similarly to most approaches, the BWM may be computationally demanding for large borders
C
, at which the wave function must satisfy specified boundary conditions. Also, despite the fact the BWM is an exact procedure, usually it is not amenable to closed form solutions. The BWM relies on the Green’s function
G
0
of the embedding domain
V
of
C
. However, in many instances—like for
C
modeling a billiard—the specific
V
is not really fundamental and thus one has a certain freedom to choose distinct domains and so
G
0
’s. Here we consider this characteristic of the BWM and show how to obtain some analytical results and solve numerically semi-infinite waveguides by exploring proper Green’s functions. As examples, we discuss rectangular, triangular and trapezoidal structures with both Dirichlet and leaking boundaries as well as scattering states within semi-infinite rectangular waveguides. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-8113 1751-8121 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1751-8121/ac5b90 |