Inferring CO 2 fertilization effect based on global monitoring land-atmosphere exchange with a theoretical model
Rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration ([CO 2 ]) enhances photosynthesis and reduces transpiration at the leaf, ecosystem, and global scale via the CO 2 fertilization effect. The CO 2 fertilization effect is among the most important processes for predicting the terrestrial carbon budget and future cl...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research letters 2020-08, Vol.15 (8), p.84009 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Rising atmospheric CO
2
concentration ([CO
2
]) enhances photosynthesis and reduces transpiration at the leaf, ecosystem, and global scale via the CO
2
fertilization effect. The CO
2
fertilization effect is among the most important processes for predicting the terrestrial carbon budget and future climate, yet it has been elusive to quantify. For evaluating the CO
2
fertilization effect on land photosynthesis and transpiration, we developed a technique that isolated this effect from other confounding effects, such as changes in climate, using a noisy time series of observed land-atmosphere CO
2
and water vapor exchange. Here, we evaluate the magnitude of this effect from 2000 to 2014 globally based on constraint optimization of gross primary productivity (GPP) and evapotranspiration in a canopy photosynthesis model over 104 global eddy-covariance stations. We found a consistent increase of GPP (0.138 ± 0.007% ppm
−1
; percentile per rising ppm of [CO
2
]) and a concomitant decrease in transpiration (−0.073% ± 0.006% ppm
−1
) due to rising [CO
2
]. Enhanced GPP from CO
2
fertilization after the baseline year 2000 is, on average, 1.2% of global GPP, 12.4 g C m
−2
yr
−1
or 1.8 Pg C yr
−1
at the years from 2001 to 2014. Our result demonstrates that the current increase in [CO
2
] could potentially explain the recent land CO
2
sink at the global scale. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1748-9326 1748-9326 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1748-9326/ab79e5 |