Flux trapping experiments to verify simulation models

Flux trapping in superconducting integrated circuits cause circuits to operate with reduced margins, or to fail completely. Moats are used in superconducting ground planes to create low energy locations for flux trapping. Moat design and placement strategies have been presented before, and several e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Superconductor science & technology 2020-10, Vol.33 (10), p.105001, Article 105001
Hauptverfasser: Jackman, Kyle, Fourie, Coenrad J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Flux trapping in superconducting integrated circuits cause circuits to operate with reduced margins, or to fail completely. Moats are used in superconducting ground planes to create low energy locations for flux trapping. Moat design and placement strategies have been presented before, and several experiments published to evaluate moat efficiency. Although fluxons can be steered to moats to prevent trapping in or near Josephson junctions or inductive interconnects, the flux in a moat couples to nearby structures and induces dc currents in superconducting loops. In this paper, we discuss a set of numerical simulation tools for flux trapping analysis, developed under the IARPA SuperTools project. These tools are used to extract compact models for magnetic flux trapped in moats, including the magnetic coupling to superconducting structures. An open-source superconducting transient simulation engine, called JoSIM, is used to simulate these compact models. To evaluate the magnetic coupling of different moat configurations, we developed a set of a flux linkage experiments. Test structures were designed for the multi-layer MIT Lincoln Laboratory SFQ5ee process that allow for flux insertion into moats of different configurations. From experimental results we measure the effects of trapped flux, in different moat structures, on SQUID parameters and use the results to validate the compact models used by our tools.
ISSN:0953-2048
1361-6668
DOI:10.1088/1361-6668/aba79b