Comparison of bolus- and filtering-based EIT measures of lung perfusion in an animal model
Objective: Two main functional imaging approaches have been used to measure regional lung perfusion using electrical impedance tomography (EIT): venous injection of a hypertonic saline contrast agent and imaging of its passage through the heart and lungs, and digital filtering of heart-frequency imp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physiological measurement 2019-06, Vol.40 (5), p.054002-054002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: Two main functional imaging approaches have been used to measure regional lung perfusion using electrical impedance tomography (EIT): venous injection of a hypertonic saline contrast agent and imaging of its passage through the heart and lungs, and digital filtering of heart-frequency impedance changes over sequences of EIT images. This paper systematically compares filtering-based perfusion estimates and bolus injection methods to determine to which degree they are related. Approach: EIT data was recorded on seven mechanically ventilated newborn lambs in which ventilation distribution was varied through changes in posture between prone, supine, left- and right-lateral positions. Perfusion images were calculated using frequency filtering and ensemble averaging during both ventilation and apnoea time segments for each posture to compare against contrast agent-based methods using Jaccard distance score. Main results: Using bolus-based EIT measures of lung perfusion as the reference frequency filtering techniques performed better than ensemble averaging and both techniques performed equally well across apnoea and ventilation data segments. Significance: Our results indicate the potential for use of filtering-based EIT measures of heart-frequency activity as a non-invasive proxy for contrast agent injection-based measures of lung perfusion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0967-3334 1361-6579 1361-6579 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1361-6579/ab1794 |