Multiparametric MR-based radiomics fusion combined with quantitative stratified ADC-defined tumor habitats for differentiating TNBC versus non-TNBC

Objective. To investigate the incremental value of quantitative stratified apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) defined tumor habitats for differentiating triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) based feature-fusion radiomics (R FF ) model. Approach. 466 bre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2024-03, Vol.69 (5), p.55032
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Wanli, Liang, Fangrong, Zhao, Yue, Li, Jiamin, He, Chutong, Zhao, Yandong, Lai, Shengsheng, Xu, Yongzhou, Ding, Wenshuang, Wei, Xinhua, Jiang, Xinqing, Yang, Ruimeng, Zhen, Xin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective. To investigate the incremental value of quantitative stratified apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) defined tumor habitats for differentiating triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) based feature-fusion radiomics (R FF ) model. Approach. 466 breast cancer patients (54 TNBC, 412 non-TNBC) who underwent routine breast MRIs in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from whole tumor on T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC maps and the 2nd phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Four models including the R FF model (fused features from all MRI sequences), R ADC model (ADC radiomics feature), Stratified ADC model (tumor habitas defined on stratified ADC parameters) and combinational R FF -Stratified ADC model were constructed to distinguish TNBC versus non-TNBC. All cases were randomly divided into a training ( n = 337) and test set ( n = 129). The four competing models were validated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Main results. Both the R FF and Stratified ADC models demonstrated good performance in distinguishing TNBC from non-TNBC, with best AUCs of 0.818 and 0.773 in the training and test sets. Stratified ADC model revealed significant different tumor habitats (necrosis/cysts habitat, chaotic habitat or proliferative tumor core) between TNBC and non-TNBC with its top three discriminative parameters ( p < 0.05). The integrated R FF -Stratified ADC model demonstrated superior accuracy over the other three models, with higher AUCs of 0.832 and 0.784 in the training and test set, respectively ( p < 0.05). Significance. The R FF -Stratified ADC model through integrating various tumor habitats’ information from whole-tumor ADC maps-based Stratified ADC model and radiomics information from mpMRI-based R FF model, exhibits tremendous promise for identifying TNBC.
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/ad25c0