Fast D M,M calculation in LDR brachytherapy using deep learning methods

The Monte Carlo (MC) method provides a complete solution to the tissue heterogeneity effects in low-energy low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. However, long computation times limit the clinical implementation of MC-based treatment planning solutions. This work aims to apply deep learning (DL) methods...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Physics in medicine & biology 2023-06, Vol.68 (11), p.114001
Hauptverfasser: Berumen, Francisco, Enger, Shirin A, Beaulieu, Luc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The Monte Carlo (MC) method provides a complete solution to the tissue heterogeneity effects in low-energy low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy. However, long computation times limit the clinical implementation of MC-based treatment planning solutions. This work aims to apply deep learning (DL) methods, specifically a model trained with MC simulations, to predict accurate dose to medium in medium ( ) distributions in LDR prostate brachytherapy. To train the DL model, 2369 single-seed configurations, corresponding to 44 prostate patient plans, were used. These patients underwent LDR brachytherapy treatments in which I SelectSeed sources were implanted. For each seed configuration, the patient geometry, the MC dose volume and the single-seed plan volume were used to train a 3D Unet convolutional neural network. Previous knowledge was included in the network as an kernel related to the first-order dose dependency in brachytherapy. MC and DL dose distributions were compared through the dose maps, isodose lines, and dose-volume histograms. Features enclosed in the model were visualized. Model features started from the symmetrical kernel and finalized with an anisotropic representation that considered the patient organs and their interfaces, the source position, and the low- and high-dose regions. For a full prostate patient, small differences were seen below the 20% isodose line. When comparing DL-based and MC-based calculations, the predicted CTV metric had an average difference of -0.1%. Average differences for OARs were -1.3%, 0.07%, and 4.9% for the rectum , the bladder , and the urethra . The model took 1.8 ms to predict a complete 3D volume (1.18 M voxels). The proposed DL model stands for a simple and fast engine which includes prior physics knowledge of the problem. Such an engine considers the anisotropy of a brachytherapy source and the patient tissue composition.
ISSN:0031-9155
1361-6560
DOI:10.1088/1361-6560/accd42