Corrigendum: universal behaviour of domain wall meandering (2013 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25 205301)
Expressions (7) and 8) of ref. [1] are incorrect. The correct expressions (7) and (8) should read, <n^2>=(1+e^((-ε)⁄(k_B T)) )^2/(2(1-e^((-ε)⁄(k_B T)) )^2 ) a^2 (7) and <n^2>=(1+e^(-□(T_c/T) ln(3)) )^2/(2(1-e^(-□(T_...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. Condensed matter 2019-12, Vol.31 (49), p.499501 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Expressions (7) and 8) of ref. [1] are incorrect. The correct expressions (7) and (8) should read, <n^2>=(1+e^((-ε)⁄(k_B T)) )^2/(2(1-e^((-ε)⁄(k_B T)) )^2 ) a^2 (7) and <n^2>=(1+e^(-□(T_c/T) ln(3)) )^2/(2(1-e^(-□(T_c/T) ln(3)) )^2 ) a^2 (8) At the critical temperature, T_c, the mean square kink length of the triangular lattice should be 2a^2 and not 1a^2. The slope in Figure 5, i.e. □((<n^2>)⁄a)=2a, where a=0.5 nm is the lattice constant of the (√3 x√3)R〖30〗^o lattice of the decanethiol self-assembled monolayer on the Au(111) substrate, remains unaltered (slope is ~ 1 nm) and therefore our conclusions remain valid.
. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0953-8984 1361-648X |
DOI: | 10.1088/1361-648X/ab3f5b |