Characterization of systematic error in Advanced LIGO calibration

The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finishe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Classical and quantum gravity 2020-11, Vol.37 (22), p.225008
Hauptverfasser: Sun, Ling, Goetz, Evan, Kissel, Jeffrey S, Betzwieser, Joseph, Karki, Sudarshan, Viets, Aaron, Wade, Madeline, Bhattacharjee, Dripta, Bossilkov, Vladimir, Covas, Pep B, Datrier, Laurence E H, Gray, Rachel, Kandhasamy, Shivaraj, Lecoeuche, Yannick K, Mendell, Gregory, Mistry, Timesh, Payne, Ethan, Savage, Richard L, Weinstein, Alan J, Aston, Stuart, Buikema, Aaron, Cahillane, Craig, Driggers, Jenne C, Dwyer, Sheila E, Kumar, Rahul, Urban, Alexander
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The raw outputs of the detectors within the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory need to be calibrated in order to produce the estimate of the dimensionless strain used for astrophysical analyses. The two detectors have been upgraded since the second observing run and finished the year-long third observing run. Understanding, accounting, and/or compensating for the complex-valued response of each part of the upgraded detectors improves the overall accuracy of the estimated detector response to gravitational waves. We describe improved understanding and methods used to quantify the response of each detector, with a dedicated effort to define all places where systematic error plays a role. We use the detectors as they stand in the first half (six months) of the third observing run to demonstrate how each identified systematic error impacts the estimated strain and constrain the statistical uncertainty therein. For this time period, we estimate the upper limit on systematic error and associated uncertainty to be
ISSN:0264-9381
1361-6382
DOI:10.1088/1361-6382/abb14e