Intramuscular olanzapine versus short-acting typical intramuscular antipsychotics: Comparison of real-life effectiveness in the treatment of agitation

Objective. To compare the effectiveness of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and typical IM antipsychotics in naturalistically treated acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or acute mania. Methods. During the acute phase, 2011 inpatients (including emergency settings) were assessed at 2, 24 and 7...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The world journal of biological psychiatry 2009, Vol.10 (1), p.43-53
Hauptverfasser: Castle, David J., Udristoiu, Tudor, Yoon Kim, Chang, Sarosi, Andrea, Pidrman, Vladimir, Omar, A. Nasser, Rosales, Juan Ignacio, Melamed, Yuval, Isik, Turgut, Karagianis, Jamie, Treuer, Tamas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective. To compare the effectiveness of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine and typical IM antipsychotics in naturalistically treated acutely agitated patients with schizophrenia or acute mania. Methods. During the acute phase, 2011 inpatients (including emergency settings) were assessed at 2, 24 and 72 h, and 7 days following initial injection and on oral antipsychotic transition. Mean change in agitation was assessed via Positive and Negative Symptom Scale-Excited Component (PANSS-EC) and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity (CGI-S) scores. Response (≥40% reduction in baseline PANSS-EC score) was analysed using logistic regression. Results. Significantly greater decreases in PANSS-EC and CGI-S scores were observed in patients receiving IM olanzapine (n=1294) as their first injection compared with patients receiving other IM antipsychotics (n=717) (P
ISSN:1562-2975
1814-1412
DOI:10.1080/15622970802688051