Conditional moment closure modelling of turbulent jet diffusion flames of helium-diluted hydrogen

First-order conditional moment closure (CMC) modelling of NO in non-premixed flames has met with limited success due to the need to consider turbulence influences on the conditional production rate of chemical species. This paper presents results obtained using a second-order approach where such eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Combustion theory and modelling 2005-08, Vol.9 (3), p.433-447
Hauptverfasser: Fairweather, M., Woolley, R. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:First-order conditional moment closure (CMC) modelling of NO in non-premixed flames has met with limited success due to the need to consider turbulence influences on the conditional production rate of chemical species. This paper presents results obtained using a second-order approach where such effects are incorporated through solution of a transport equation for the conditional variance. In contrast to earlier work, second-order chemistry is implemented using a more robust numerical technique, with predictions obtained using a Reynolds stress turbulence model. First-order CMC and k-ϵ turbulence model predictions are presented for comparison purposes. For the hydrogen flames examined, results demonstrate small differences between first- and second-order calculations of major species and temperature, although second-order corrections reduce NO and OH levels. Additionally, variations occur between results for these species derived using the two turbulence models due to differences in conditional variance predictions. This and the numerical solution method employed are responsible for deviations with earlier results. It is concluded that while the higher-order CMC model does not significantly improve NO predictions, agreement with OH data is superior. Physical space predictions are sufficiently accurate for assessing flame characteristics, with the Reynolds stress model providing superior results.
ISSN:1364-7830
1741-3559
DOI:10.1080/13647830500184264