Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior block versus instillation of local anaesthetic through surgical drain in modified radical mastectomy: A randomized controlled study

The primary outcome measure of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided serratus anterior block versus instillation of local anesthetic through the surgical drain in modified radical mastectomy patients as regards the duration of analgesia between the two techniques. This prospective, randomized,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Egyptian journal of anaesthesia 2022-12, Vol.38 (1), p.565-571
Hauptverfasser: Mahrous, Rabab S. S., Fayed, Haytham Awad, Kamal, Abdelrahman Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The primary outcome measure of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided serratus anterior block versus instillation of local anesthetic through the surgical drain in modified radical mastectomy patients as regards the duration of analgesia between the two techniques. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was conducted on 162 female patients aged 25-50 years, ASA 1, ASA 2, selected for elective unilateral modified radical mastectomy in the Main University Hospital. Group SABP (n = 81) received 20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% in the plan between serratus anterior and latissimus dorsi muscles. Group LA (n = 81) received 40 ml bupivacaine 0.25%, 20 ml in each surgical drain (axillary and chest wall drain). The results of the study revealed that the duration of analgesia lasted for 20.8 hr in the SAPB group, while it was 8.14 hourshr in the LA group (P-value ˂0.001). In most postoperative periods, the SAPB group had lower VAS scores at rest and with movement of the ipsilateral arm compared to the LA group. The overall dose and frequency of the consumed rescue analgesic over the first 24 hr in the postoperative period were significantly lower in the SAPB group than in the second group (P-value
ISSN:1110-1849
1110-1849
DOI:10.1080/11101849.2022.2131347