A decade on the court: The First Amendment jurisprudence of Justice Antonin Scalia

After a decade on the United States Supreme Court the time is ripe to examine Associate Justice Antonin Scalia's First Amendment jurisprudence, especially as it relates to freedom of expression and freedom of the press. This article analyzes Justice Scalia's opinions as a judge and justice as well as his scholarly writings. Collectively they reveal a clear pattern of a justice who follows a judicial approach grounded in originalism, textualism, majoritarianism, deference to the legislative branch, and traditionalism. While this approach sometimes produces opinions Seemingly in conflict with Justice Scalia's "conservative" image, close analysis reveals the consistent and close application of a coherent judicial philosophy.