Resting energy expenditure in male athletes with a spinal cord injury

Objective: To investigate whether there are differences in the resting energy expenditure (REE) and body composition of athletes with a spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to active able-bodied controls. Design: In this cross sectional study, male athletes with a SCI were compared to active able-bodie...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of spinal cord medicine 2018-03, Vol.41 (2), p.208-215
Hauptverfasser: Pelly, Fiona E., Broad, Elizabeth M., Stuart, Natalie, Holmes, Mark A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective: To investigate whether there are differences in the resting energy expenditure (REE) and body composition of athletes with a spinal cord injury (SCI) compared to active able-bodied controls. Design: In this cross sectional study, male athletes with a SCI were compared to active able-bodied controls matched for age, stretch stature and body mass. In addition, the accuracy of standard REE prediction equations in estimating REE was assessed. Participants: Seven male wheelchair athletes with a SCI and six matched active able-bodied controls volunteered to participate. Outcome measures: REE was measured using indirect calorimetry and estimated using population-specific prediction equations. Body composition (lean tissue mass, fat mass and bone mineral content) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Results: While absolute and adjusted REE in the athletes with SCI was lower than controls, this difference was not significant (P = 0.259). When adjusted for lean tissue mass (LTM), REE was significantly higher (P = 0.038) in the athletes with SCI compared to the controls (146 ± 29kJ/kg LTM vs. 125 ± 8kJ/kg LTM). LTM was significantly lower in the athletes with SCI (44.35 ± 6.98 kg) compared to the able-bodied controls (56.02 ± 4.93 kg; P < 0.01). The differences between predicted and measured REE in the athletes with SCI were not statistically significant (except for the Owen equation), however there was no significant correlation between the measures. Conclusion: This suggests that existing prediction equations used to estimate energy requirements may require modification for athletes with SCI.
ISSN:1079-0268
2045-7723
DOI:10.1080/10790268.2017.1317060