Rainfall estimation in the West African Sahel: comparison and cross-validation of top-down vs. bottom-up precipitation products in Burkina Faso

This study compares the performance of satellite precipitation products (SPPs) and soil moisture-based rainfall products (SM2RPPs) in capturing rainfall patterns in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The findings indicate that SPPs outperform SM2RPPs at daily to annual timescales. The decomposition of total...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geocarto international 2024-01, Vol.39 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Yonaba, Roland, Belemtougri, Axel, Fowé, Tazen, Mounirou, Lawani Adjadi, Nkiaka, Elias, Dembélé, Moctar, Komlavi, Akpoti, Coly, Serigne M'backé, Koïta, Mahamadou, Karambiri, Harouna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This study compares the performance of satellite precipitation products (SPPs) and soil moisture-based rainfall products (SM2RPPs) in capturing rainfall patterns in Burkina Faso, West Africa. The findings indicate that SPPs outperform SM2RPPs at daily to annual timescales. The decomposition of total bias reveals that hit bias are dominant, but are larger in magnitude in SM2RPPs. Systematic errors are the major component of hit biases, suggesting they could be further treated through bias-correction. Wavelet analysis indicates that SPPs and SM2RPPs well capture seasonal and annual rainfall variability. All products struggle to accurately represent the most extreme rainfall indices, with SPPs performing better than SM2RPPs. For meteorological droughts, RFE2 and CHIRPS show the strongest correlations with observed SPI values across 1- to 12-month timescales. Although SM2RPPs perform less than SPPs in Burkina Faso, they appear mature for hydrometeorological applications and could further benefit from bias-correction to attain similar or better performance than SPPs.
ISSN:1010-6049
1752-0762
1752-0762
DOI:10.1080/10106049.2024.2391956