Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I
This essay uses Michael McGee's concept of the ideograph to discuss the ways that was used both by and against women in World War I. Regardless of whether women sided with the peace or the preparedness movements, their participation was defined by their status as mothers (either actual or metap...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Rhetoric review 2017-07, Vol.36 (3), p.214-231 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 231 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 214 |
container_title | Rhetoric review |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Mastrangelo, Lisa |
description | This essay uses Michael McGee's concept of the ideograph to discuss the ways that was used both by and against women in World War I. Regardless of whether women sided with the peace or the preparedness movements, their participation was defined by their status as mothers (either actual or metaphorical). Their participation was also conscribed by societal and governmental ideals of motherhood, conveyed through a shifting ideographic definition. Women's rhetorical practices during the war were, therefore, both constrained and defined by notions of motherhood. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/07350198.2017.1318253 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07350198_2017_1318253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26784067</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26784067</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-48aef78930bb4177b5161ac5b23f3b7affd23320d984e12174b86a858420e70a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_wiBvPnXmo21Sn5T6NZgoouwxpGmyZnbJSCqy_96WTh99ulzO79zLOQDMMJpjxNEVYjRDuOBzgjCbY4o5yegRmOCMkoQVHB-DycAkA3QKzmLcIIRzxvIJ-Cwb6dbWreGi1n4d5K6J0Bv47LtGh8b7-hreaWPdgEhXw9K7qIKthn3lt9pdRvjW6M4Hq2QLX4NUnVU6wruvMDKhreFKBrg4BydGtlFfHOYUfDzcv5dPyfLlcVHeLhNFKemSlEttGC8oqqoUM1ZlOMdSZRWhhlZMGlOTHkR1wVONCWZpxXPJM54SpBmSdAqy8a4KPsagjdgFu5VhLzASQ2PitzExNCYOjfW-2ejbxD7On4nkjKcoZ71-M-rWGR-28nuIJjq5b30wQTplo6D_v_gBit18Dg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Mastrangelo, Lisa</creator><creatorcontrib>Mastrangelo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><description>This essay uses Michael McGee's concept of the ideograph to discuss the ways that was used both by and against women in World War I. Regardless of whether women sided with the peace or the preparedness movements, their participation was defined by their status as mothers (either actual or metaphorical). Their participation was also conscribed by societal and governmental ideals of motherhood, conveyed through a shifting ideographic definition. Women's rhetorical practices during the war were, therefore, both constrained and defined by notions of motherhood.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0735-0198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/07350198.2017.1318253</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><ispartof>Rhetoric review, 2017-07, Vol.36 (3), p.214-231</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-48aef78930bb4177b5161ac5b23f3b7affd23320d984e12174b86a858420e70a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-48aef78930bb4177b5161ac5b23f3b7affd23320d984e12174b86a858420e70a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26784067$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26784067$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mastrangelo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><title>Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I</title><title>Rhetoric review</title><description>This essay uses Michael McGee's concept of the ideograph to discuss the ways that was used both by and against women in World War I. Regardless of whether women sided with the peace or the preparedness movements, their participation was defined by their status as mothers (either actual or metaphorical). Their participation was also conscribed by societal and governmental ideals of motherhood, conveyed through a shifting ideographic definition. Women's rhetorical practices during the war were, therefore, both constrained and defined by notions of motherhood.</description><issn>0735-0198</issn><issn>1532-7981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_wiBvPnXmo21Sn5T6NZgoouwxpGmyZnbJSCqy_96WTh99ulzO79zLOQDMMJpjxNEVYjRDuOBzgjCbY4o5yegRmOCMkoQVHB-DycAkA3QKzmLcIIRzxvIJ-Cwb6dbWreGi1n4d5K6J0Bv47LtGh8b7-hreaWPdgEhXw9K7qIKthn3lt9pdRvjW6M4Hq2QLX4NUnVU6wruvMDKhreFKBrg4BydGtlFfHOYUfDzcv5dPyfLlcVHeLhNFKemSlEttGC8oqqoUM1ZlOMdSZRWhhlZMGlOTHkR1wVONCWZpxXPJM54SpBmSdAqy8a4KPsagjdgFu5VhLzASQ2PitzExNCYOjfW-2ejbxD7On4nkjKcoZ71-M-rWGR-28nuIJjq5b30wQTplo6D_v_gBit18Dg</recordid><startdate>20170703</startdate><enddate>20170703</enddate><creator>Mastrangelo, Lisa</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170703</creationdate><title>Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I</title><author>Mastrangelo, Lisa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-48aef78930bb4177b5161ac5b23f3b7affd23320d984e12174b86a858420e70a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mastrangelo, Lisa</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Rhetoric review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mastrangelo, Lisa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I</atitle><jtitle>Rhetoric review</jtitle><date>2017-07-03</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>231</epage><pages>214-231</pages><issn>0735-0198</issn><eissn>1532-7981</eissn><abstract>This essay uses Michael McGee's concept of the ideograph to discuss the ways that was used both by and against women in World War I. Regardless of whether women sided with the peace or the preparedness movements, their participation was defined by their status as mothers (either actual or metaphorical). Their participation was also conscribed by societal and governmental ideals of motherhood, conveyed through a shifting ideographic definition. Women's rhetorical practices during the war were, therefore, both constrained and defined by notions of motherhood.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/07350198.2017.1318253</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0735-0198 |
ispartof | Rhetoric review, 2017-07, Vol.36 (3), p.214-231 |
issn | 0735-0198 1532-7981 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1080_07350198_2017_1318253 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
title | Changing Ideographs of Motherhood: Defining and Conscribing Women's Rhetorical Practices During World War I |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T05%3A05%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Changing%20Ideographs%20of%20Motherhood:%20Defining%20and%20Conscribing%20Women's%20Rhetorical%20Practices%20During%20World%20War%20I&rft.jtitle=Rhetoric%20review&rft.au=Mastrangelo,%20Lisa&rft.date=2017-07-03&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=231&rft.pages=214-231&rft.issn=0735-0198&rft.eissn=1532-7981&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/07350198.2017.1318253&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_cross%3E26784067%3C/jstor_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26784067&rfr_iscdi=true |