Moral reasoning in peer conversations during game-based learning: An exploratory study

This mixed-methods study is an exploration of fifth and sixth grade students' interactions with an online game called Quandary, a comic-book-esque game aimed at stimulating ethical decision-making. Building on the domain-based moral education framework, researchers designed and implemented a sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of moral education 2021-04, Vol.50 (2), p.140-165
Hauptverfasser: Ilten-Gee, Robyn, Hilliard, Lacey J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This mixed-methods study is an exploration of fifth and sixth grade students' interactions with an online game called Quandary, a comic-book-esque game aimed at stimulating ethical decision-making. Building on the domain-based moral education framework, researchers designed and implemented a short-term intervention in three classrooms in which students played an episode of Quandary in pairs. Students' pre- and post-test reasoning assessment responses were coded for reasoning levels and coordination types. Conversations between 12 student pairs were recorded during game-play. We coded their speech for transactive discourse. We focus on two pairs of students that engaged in sophisticated transactive discourse; we discuss the potential of their interactions and demonstrate the potential of Quandary as a catalyst for moral discussion. Implications for informing innovative approaches to moral education are discussed.
ISSN:0305-7240
1465-3877
DOI:10.1080/03057240.2019.1662775