Is it Ethical to Exclude Obesity as a Disability?
Levenson et al. discuss whether the exclusion of obesity as a disability is ethical. After applying the Army-Baylor 7-Step Method Modified for Organizational Decision Making, it becomes clear that, from an ethical perspective, it is unjust to exclude obesity as a disability when weighed against othe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of legal medicine (Chicago. 1979) 2017-12, Vol.37 (sup1), p.49-51 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Levenson et al. discuss whether the exclusion of obesity as a disability is ethical. After applying the Army-Baylor 7-Step Method Modified for Organizational Decision Making, it becomes clear that, from an ethical perspective, it is unjust to exclude obesity as a disability when weighed against other conditions covered by the ADAAA. Excluding obesity also violates the principle of nonmaleficence with regard to those who, because of obesity, cannot be functional members of society. As difficult as it may be, it is recommended that a better definition for obesity be developed to differentiate between those who are obese and disabled verses those who are larger than the medical ideal but are considered functional and, perhaps even, healthy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0194-7648 1521-057X |
DOI: | 10.1080/01947648.2017.1479117 |