the "death" macguffin redux: comments on best
In commenting on my critique of the "deviance is dead" thesis ( Goode, 2003 ), Joel Best (in this issue) makes several points which seem shaky. Examined critically-and agreeing that the field has declined during the past 20 years in creativity and influence on sociology generally-the socio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Deviant behavior 2004-09, Vol.25 (5), p.493-509 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In commenting on my critique of the "deviance is dead" thesis (
Goode, 2003
), Joel Best (in this issue) makes several points which seem shaky. Examined critically-and agreeing that the field has declined during the past 20 years in creativity and influence on sociology generally-the sociology of deviance is far from "dead." In fact, as indicated by a number of measures, its health is as robust as ever. Here, I grapple with the conundrum of why the "death" myth is so widely accepted among sociologists. It is possible that the field's political incorrectness may provide an explanation to this mystery. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0163-9625 1521-0456 |
DOI: | 10.1080/01639620490441317 |