the "death" macguffin redux: comments on best

In commenting on my critique of the "deviance is dead" thesis ( Goode, 2003 ), Joel Best (in this issue) makes several points which seem shaky. Examined critically-and agreeing that the field has declined during the past 20 years in creativity and influence on sociology generally-the socio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Deviant behavior 2004-09, Vol.25 (5), p.493-509
1. Verfasser: Goode, Erich
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In commenting on my critique of the "deviance is dead" thesis ( Goode, 2003 ), Joel Best (in this issue) makes several points which seem shaky. Examined critically-and agreeing that the field has declined during the past 20 years in creativity and influence on sociology generally-the sociology of deviance is far from "dead." In fact, as indicated by a number of measures, its health is as robust as ever. Here, I grapple with the conundrum of why the "death" myth is so widely accepted among sociologists. It is possible that the field's political incorrectness may provide an explanation to this mystery.
ISSN:0163-9625
1521-0456
DOI:10.1080/01639620490441317