Multiple Comparisons with the Best Treatment
Let π 1 , π 2 , ..., π k be k ≥ 2 sources of observations (treatments, populations) and suppose the "goodness" of treatment π i is characterized by the size of an unknown real-valued parameter θ i . Let θ [k] = max 1≤i≤k θ i . If π i is preferred to π j when θ i > θ j , the parameters δ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Statistical Association 1983-12, Vol.78 (384), p.965-971 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Let π
1
, π
2
, ..., π
k
be k ≥ 2 sources of observations (treatments, populations) and suppose the "goodness" of treatment π
i
is characterized by the size of an unknown real-valued parameter θ
i
. Let θ
[k]
= max
1≤i≤k
θ
i
. If π
i
is preferred to π
j
when θ
i
> θ
j
, the parameters δ
i
= θ
[k]
- θ
i
, i = 1, 2, ..., k reflect in an inverse sense the "goodness" of each treatment relative to the "best" treatment. A general technique for obtaining simultaneous confidence intervals on the δ
i
is demonstrated with several examples. This technique can be applied in any setting where comparison-with-control intervals can be computed regarding any π
j
as the control. These results have special importance in ranking and selection problems in that the process of generating upper bounds on the δ
i
generates traditional confidence statements of both the indifference zone and the subset selection schools, simultaneously, as established by Hsu (1981). |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0162-1459 1537-274X |
DOI: | 10.1080/01621459.1983.10477047 |