Humanizing the multiple-choice test with partial credit

We describe an innovative method for machine-grading precalculus students: the partial-credit, multiple-choice test (PCMCT). Our scheme is to assign partial credit to any wrong multiple-choice answer for which we can ascribe partially correct reasoning. This permits us to accumulate additional infor...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of mathematical education in science and technology 1993-11, Vol.24 (6), p.799-812
Hauptverfasser: Cherkas, Barry M., Roitberg, Joseph
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:We describe an innovative method for machine-grading precalculus students: the partial-credit, multiple-choice test (PCMCT). Our scheme is to assign partial credit to any wrong multiple-choice answer for which we can ascribe partially correct reasoning. This permits us to accumulate additional information about the extent of a student's incomplete understanding. We add the assigned partial credit to arrive at our final measure of a student's total knowledge-the student's grade. In comparison with the standard multiple-choice test (MCT), the PCMCT judiciously avoids the necessity to scale scores-an educationally unsound but common practice with MCTs. In addition, the PCMCT turns out to be better at distinguishing uneducated guessing than the MCT. We conducted student surveys in our pre-calculus classes and found that most students believed the PCMCT is a more accurate measure of their knowledge than the MCT. We also uncovered the remarkable result that most students are less math-anxious when taking the PCMCT than when taking either the MCT or a standard essay test.
ISSN:0020-739X
1464-5211
DOI:10.1080/0020739930240604